Storia economica : About

| Home | Issues | Submission | Contact |

---

About

1. Anagrafica / Master data
2. Redazione / Editorial team
3. Codice etico / Publication Ethics

1. Anagrafica / Master data

Editore / Publisher ISSN: 1824-5064

2. Redazione / Editorial team

Comitato di direzione / Co-Editors
Andrea Cafarelli (Università di Udine), Giovanni Ceccarelli (Università di Parma), Daniela Ciccolella (CNR-ISMed), Alida Clemente (Università di Foggia), Francesco Dandolo (Università Federico II di Napoli), Luigi De Matteo (Università L’Orientale di Napoli), Giovanni Farese (Università Europea di Roma), Andrea Giuntini (Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia), Alberto Guenzi (Università di Parma), Amedeo Lepore (Università della Campania), Stefano Magagnoli (Università di Parma), Giuseppe Moricola (Università L’Orientale di Napoli), Angela Orlandi (Università di Firenze), Gian Luca Podestà (Università di Parma), Mario Rizzo (Università di Pavia), Gaetano Sabatini (Università di Roma Tre)

Comitato scientifico / Scientific Committee
Frediano Bof (Università di Udine), Giorgio Borelli (Università di Verona), Aldo Carera (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano), Francesco D’Esposito (Università G. D’Annunzio di Chieti-Pescara), Marco Doria (Università di Genova), Giulio Fenicia (Università di Bari), Luciana Frangioni (Università del Molise), Paolo Frascani (Università L’Orientale di Napoli), Maurizio Gangemi (Università di Bari), Germano Maifreda (Università di Milano), Daniela Manetti (Università di Pisa), Paola Massa (Università di Genova), Giampiero Nigro (Università di Firenze), Nicola Ostuni (Università Magna Græcia di Catanzaro), Paola Pierucci (Università G. D’Annunzio di Chieti-Pescara), Giovanni Vigo (Università di Pavia), Giovanni Zalin (Università di Verona)

3. Codice etico / Publication Ethics

• actively seek the views of authors, readers, reviewers and editorial board members about ways of improving their journal’s processes
• support initiatives designed to reduce academic misconduct
• support initiatives to educate researchers about publication ethics
• assess the effects of their journal policies on author and reviewer behaviour and revise policies, as required, to encourage responsible behaviour and discourage misconduct
• ensure that any press releases issued by the journal reflect the message of the reported article and put it into context
• ensure that all published reports of research have been reviewed by suitably qualified reviewers
• adopt processes that encourage accuracy, completeness and clarity of research reporting
• adopt authorship or contributorship systems that promote good practice and discourage misconduct
• publish clear instructions in their journals about submission
• require all contributors to disclose relevant competing interests and publish corrections if competing interests are revealed after publication
• ensure that appropriate reviewers are selected for submissions
• respect requests from authors that an individual should not review their submission, if these are well-reasoned
• require reviewers to disclose any potential competing interests before agreeing to review a submission
• encourage reviewers to comment on ethical questions and possible research misconduct raised by submissions
• encourage reviewers to ensure the originality of submissions and be alert to redundant publication and plagiarism
• seek to acknowledge the contribution of reviewers to the journal o monitor the performance of peer reviewers and take steps to ensure this is of high quality o develop and maintain a database of suitable reviewers, and update this on the basis of reviewer performance
• ensure that the reviewer database reflects the academic community for their journal o use a wide range of sources to identify potential new reviewers o identify suitably qualified editorial board members who can actively contribute to the development and good management of the journal o provide clear guidance to editorial board members about their expected functions and duties, these might include:
  

• acting as ambassadors for the journal
• supporting and promoting the journal
• seeking out the best authors and best work and actively encouraging submissions
• reviewing submissions to the journal
• accepting commissions to write editorials, reviews and commentaries on papers in their specialist area
• attending and contributing to editorial board meetings

• consult editorial board members regularly
• have systems in place to detect falsified data
• base decisions about journal house style on relevant evidence of factors that raise the quality of reporting rather than simply on aesthetic grounds or personal preference
• have systems in place to give authors the opportunity to make original research articles freely available
• adopt systems for detecting plagiarism
• support authors whose copyright has been breached or who have been the victims of plagiarism
• be prepared to defend authors’ rights and pursue offenders irrespective of whether their journal holds the copyright
• have policies and systems in place to ensure that commercial considerations do not affect editorial decisions o adopt suitable policies for handling submissions from themselves to ensure unbiased review